
As a psychotherapist, I work with many South Asian couples, and one truth has
become very clear to me over the years:
Cheating is not a โmenโs issueโ or a โwomenโs issue.โ
It is a relationship rupture, and I see it happen in marriages regardless of gender.

Sometimes the partner who betrayed is the husband.
Sometimes it is the wife.
And sometimes both partners are carrying unspoken emotional wounds that made the
relationship vulnerable long before the betrayal occurred.
What remains constant is not who cheated but the impact betrayal has on the nervous
system, identity, faith, and emotional safety of the partner who was hurt.
โBetrayal is not defined by gender, it is defined by the loss of emotional safety.โ
In therapy, infidelity rarely begins with physical intimacy alone. More often, it begins
with emotional distance, loneliness, and unmet needs on either side.
I see:
By the time couples arrive in my office, the betrayal is often just the visible symptom
of a deeper relational breakdown.
โCheating is rarely about desire alone, it is often about disconnection that went unspoken.โ
In South Asian communities, female infidelity is rarely discussed openly, and when it
is, it is often met with harsher judgment, shame, or moral condemnation.
In my practice, I have worked with women who cheated not out of recklessness, but
out of:
This does not justify betrayal but understanding the context helps couples move away
from blame and toward clarity.
โUnderstanding the pain behind betrayal is not the same as excusing it.โ
Similarly, when men cheat, the explanation is often oversimplified as โlack of self-
controlโ or โmale nature.โ
In therapy, I often see deeper layers:
Again! context does not equal permission, but healing requires honesty about what
truly happened beneath the surface.
From a trauma-informed perspective, betrayal impacts the brain and body profoundly.
The partner who was cheated on whether husband or wife, often experiences:
Many clients ask me, โWhy canโt I just move on?โ
Because betrayal is not just emotional pain, it is relational trauma.
In South Asian families, both men and women may be pressured to โhold the
marriage togetherโ at all costs, but this pressure falls disproportionately on women.
I often hear:
In my work, I gently reframe this belief:
Faith does not require tolerating ongoing emotional harm.
True faith invites accountability, repentance, repair, and protection of human dignity.
Yes! Sometimes.
But only when real accountability replaces defensiveness.
From my clinical experience, healing requires:
When both partners, regardless of gender; are willing to do this work, repair is
possible.
But when patterns repeat, denial persists, or the betrayed partner is blamed for their
pain, therapy must shift toward self-protection and emotional safety.
โReconciliation without accountability is not healing, it is re-traumatization.โ
There are moments in my therapy room when a client; woman or man realizes they
have tried everything:
Communication, forgiveness, prayer, compromise, therapy.
At that point, the question changes from:
โHow do I save this marriage?โ
to
โHow do I preserve my mental, emotional, and physical health?โ
Leaving or redefining boundaries is not a failure of faith or character.
Sometimes, it is an act of courage and self-respect.
โProtecting yourself is not betrayal, it is survival.โ
At Mind Wings Counselling Services, I work with individuals and couples navigating
betrayal with:
Whether you are the partner who was hurt or the one who crossed a boundary, you
deserve a space to understand what happened and decide what healing looks like for
you.
Mind Wings Counselling Services
www.mindwings.ca
You are not broken.
Your pain makes sense.
And healing is possible with honesty, support, and compassion.

Mindwings. All Rights Reserved.